Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Chaffetz Kills Public Lands Bill After Backlash From Sporting Community

Posted by on Feb 2, 2017 in America, Featured, Hunting, Legislation | 0 comments

Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) announced he is withdrawing a bill that would have sold off 3.3 million acres of public lands across 10 states following backlash from the sporting community.

I am withdrawing HR 621. I'm a proud gun owner, hunter and love our public lands. The bill would have disposed of small parcels of lands Pres. Clinton identified as serving no public purpose but groups I support and care about fear it sends the wrong message. The bill was originally introduced several years ago. I look forward to working with you. I hear you and HR 621 dies tomorrow. #keepitpublic #tbt

A post shared by Jason Chaffetz (@jasoninthehouse) on

The Disposal of Excess Federal Lans Act of 2017 (or H.R. 621) would have directed “the Secretary of the Interior to sell certain Federal lands in Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and Wyoming, previously identified as suitable for disposal, and for other purposes.” This would have encompassed 3.5 million acres–  roughly the same size as the state of Connecticut.

Many saw this as a threat to access to hunting and fishing on public lands, so Chaffetz felt it was wise to withdraw the bill and let it die in the House Natural Resources Committee.

OutdoorLife reported on hunting group opposition to the bill:

Pheasants Forever shared a petition on its Facebook page the calls lawmakers to keep federal lands public. The petition has about 39,000 signatures and is a group effort supported by the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership, Pheasants Forever, National Wild Turkey Federation, Remington, Powderhook, National Wildlife Federation, and many others. Signing the petition online automatically sends the following letter to your local congressmen and women.

Many hunters and anglers are torn on management of public lands. Citing fears of an encroaching federal government, some in the sporting community would like to see the Bureau of Land Management and similar government entities reigned in for abuses in power. Others believe handing over control of public lands to states –even a smidgeon of it — will undermine the pristine nature of public lands. I myself am torn on this issue as a conservationist and angler–though I believe there could be some consensus achieved and less government meddling in hunter/angler rights.

Had this passed now, the consequences would have been dire.  Many in the sporting community heavily vote Republican and are conservative, so this would have alienated many in our base.  Good on Chaffetz to prioritize other legislative items. He and other House Republicans should turn their efforts into passing the Hearing Protection Act, which would deregulate suppressors.

On top of being a contributer to Bullets First, Gabriella is a media stategist and consultant.  You can read more of her thoughts that expand far beyond the 2nd Amendment and hunting at her home site gabriellahoffman.com

Related articles

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Send this to friend