Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Why Trump Was Both Right AND Wrong About the “2nd Amendment Solution”

Donald Trump really has no clue what he is talking about sometimes.  At best it is annoying and at worst it is harmful.

What I am referring to in this case is his remarks concerning the Supreme Court under another Clinton Administration.

In case you haven’t heard, at rally in Wilmington, North Carolina on Tuesday, Trump had this to say about the future of the courts under Clinton:

“By the way if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don’t know.”

He says it in his slick used car salesmen kind of way finishing with “i don’t know” shoulder shrug and smug grin, telling you exactly that he knows but it wouldn’t be proper to say so.

So basically saying that if Hillary Clinton is elected, “Second Amendment people” should take their guns and shoot her.

After the fallout over his comments both campaigns went into full spin mode.  With the Trump campaign trying to backtrack and saying that the Donald was talking about 2nd Amendment people coming together and voting for Trump to keep Hillary from the White House.

I hate when people think I’m stupid.

Trump OBVIOUSLY was talking about Hilary Clinton ALL READY being president and that no one could do anything about stopping her from packing the courts with left wing radicals except gun owners who might take extreme measures.  Trump knew what he was saying, he was dangling the same red meat that plays to the crowd that he was during the primary.  Except now, more people are watching and his “flipping the switch” on becoming more presidential is no so clearly a pipe dream.

Clinton’s campaign is no less laughable.  The campaign released the following statement:

“This is simple — what Trump is saying is dangerous. A person seeking to be the President of the United States should not suggest violence in any way.”

First of wrong, their premise is wrong.  Somethings are worth fighting for with violence, the least of which is not casting off the yolk of tyranny.  But I’ll get to that in a second.

Secondly, I hate hypocrites.

Hillary Clinton has used a shroud of terror and violence to hold onto whatever power she has clawed and scrabbled together over the past 3 decades, using with broken lives and dead bodies in her wake.

The Bloody Hands of Hillary Clinton (Part 1)

The Bloody Hands of Hillary Clinton (Part 2)

The Bloody Hands of Hillary Clinton (Part 3)

So, Clinton campaign, let’s not talk about a person’s hypothetical of violence when your candidate is awash in the blood of innocents.

With all that being said, let’s get to what I meant in the title of this article.

What was right about what Donald Trump said?

What was right was the notion of what the 2nd Amendment actually is intended for.  It is an understanding of the God given right that should it be necessary the people will have the means in which to deal with tyrants.  Tyrants who would tax them into poverty, strip them of their rights, jail them unfairly, impose their own will to the detriment of the people and enrich themselves on those peoples suffering.

The 2nd Amendment is the fail-safe to end such oppression and tyrannical rule.

That the day may come when patriots must once again refresh the tree of liberty with the blood of tyrants and patriots alike is in the very spirit of the 2nd Amendment.  Trump was right about.  And all the lefties who would see a nation of cowards with no free will but to serve the progressive oligarchy have their panties in a bunch now because someone (even doing it poorly) suggested in public the true solution to tyranny in America.  Tyranny that progressive radicals would welcome by the way.  That’s why lefties hate guns so much.  It is the one true obstacle standing in their way of total control.

Now the other shoe drops.

What was wrong about what Donald Trump said?

Trump made light of the seriousness that such actions would call for and what they would mean.  Not to mention giving the left more ammunition to paint gun owners as whacked out gun nuts ready to resort to violence as the first option.

Hillary Clinton is an absolute nightmare and will most likely destroy this country.  She will do everything in her power to a)promote herself and keep that power and b)push forward her progressively tyrannical ideology.

With that being said, the first action is not to put a bullet in her head.  I know, I know…odd thing to hear from a guy who runs Bullets First but its the truth.  Left wing extremists believe in pre-crime punishment and thought crimes.

I’m not saying the day won’t come when patriots must take up arms and cast down another tyrant, but there are things to do first.  You don’t like Clinton, get a congress that will oppose her.  I’m not talking about milquetoast RINO’s.  I’m talking about actually PATRIOTS who will not kow tow to party, will not go along to get along and who will put the people first.

Bill Clinton was a dangerous president too those first 2 years he was in, but with Newt Gingrich leading a empowered and more Republican party in 1994 made a contract with America and Clinton had to kneel to the will of the people or get absolutely nothing done.

My point is, that violence isn’t the answer…UNTIL it’s the answer.  And when it is the answer, like when the government is coming to take your guns, then by all means, bullets first.

For Trump to so casually talk about 2nd Amendment people dealing with Clinton after she is elected is wrong.  It is not something that should be said so glibly for cheers and grandstanding.

It is a truth that exists when the tyrant leaves no other recourse.

It is a solemn duty of the free and should be treated as such.

 

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Send this to friend